New Page 1
Panel
Wants Prudential Norms at Par With Commercial Banks
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) panel for reforms in the non-banking financial company (NBFC)
sector has suggested for an increased capital adequacy and risk weightages for
NBFCs, making it almost at par with capital and prudential requirement of
commercial banks. The panel has also suggested that NBFCs should be allowed to
raise only up to 8 times its net owned funds against 12 times now.
The
panel, while suggesting stricter controls on NBFCs, has left the business model
intact. Risk weightage for real estate exposure has gone up to 125 per cent
while for capital market it is at 150 per cent and also seeks to take away the
arbitrage between banks and NBFCs on provisioning norms.
Any
change in the shareholding, direct or indirect, of 25 per cent and above, change
in control, merger or acquisition of any registered NBFC should have prior
approval of RBI. RBI has set up this panel as NBFCs were growing in size and
becoming systemically important. Even bank credit to this segment has been
growing and now the end use of these funds will be more effectively monitored.
Panel
has suggested that minimum net owned fund requirement of new NBFCs could be
retained at Rs 2 crore till the Reserve Bank of India Act is amended. RBI,
however, should insist on a minimum asset size of more than Rs 50 crore for
registering any new NBFC. Existing NBFCs below this limit may deregister or be
asked to seek a fresh certificate of registration at the end of two years.
The
panel headed by former deputy governor Usha Throat. She is now the director at
the Center for Advances Financial Research and Learning, the research and
analysis wing of the RBI.
Sanjiv
Bajaj, managing director, Bajaj Finserv, told Financial Chronicle, “Some of
the NBFCs have grown very large over the last five years, so it is quite
necessary to bring in regulation and supervisory mechanism in place.“ The risk
weights for NBFCs that are not sponsored by banks or that do not have any bank
as part of the group may be raised to 150 per cent for capital market exposures
and 125 per cent for commercial real estate (CRE) exposures. In case of
bank-sponsored NBFCs, the risk weights for capital market exposures (CME) and
CRE may be the same as specified for banks.
Total
number of NBFCs at the end of March 2010 was 12,662 comprising 311 deposit
taking NBFCs, 295 systemically important nondeposit taking companies and 12,056
other non-deposit taking NBFCs. The assets of the sector grew from Rs 34,790
crore in 1997-98 to Rs 6,61,186 crore in 2009-10. Captive NBFCs, the business
models of which focus mainly (90 per cent and above) on financing parent
company's products, may maintain tier-I capital at 12 per cent from the time of
registration. Supervisory risk assessment of such companies should take into
account the risk of the parent company.
R
Sridhar, managing director, Shriram Transport Finance Company, said the proposed
new norm for tier-I capital at 12 per cent will not impact us. “Our tier-I
capital is around 18 per cent. This may impact business of Exercising control
Risk weights for NBFCs may be raised to 150 per cent for capital market
exposures Total number of NBFCs at the end of March 2010 was 12,662, including
311 deposit taking NBFCs The assets of the sector grew from Rs 34,790 crore in
1997-98 to Rs 6,61,186 crore in 2009-10 smaller NBFCs, who operate in diverse
sectors.“
V
Vaidyanathan, vicechairman and MD, Future Capital Holdings, said in a release,
that the guidelines on NBFCs focus on systemic risks. “The treatment on
capital market exposures is the steepest. This is warranted considering the
volatility in the stock markets. RBI has left the business model intact and has
just tightened the norms. Higher risk weightage for real estate is also
warranted,“ he said.
|